Guardrails AI
Test · Build
Validate model inputs and outputs, then test how your application handles failures.
Input/output filtering, PII redaction, prompt-injection defenses, responsible-AI policies (DPDP-aware).
Explore 3 tools for this projectShare of job postings in India, per role, that name this capability.
Needs first: Integrate LLM APIs into an application
Start with one tool for each part of your project. You don’t need to learn them all.
3 tools to explore
Test · Build
Validate model inputs and outputs, then test how your application handles failures.
Test · Build
Configure conversational guardrails and test allowed and disallowed behaviours.
Data · Test
Detect and anonymise sensitive entities in sample text before it enters a model workflow.
Build a customer-support assistant that answers loan and EMI questions from a public lending-policy PDF, then wrap it in layered guardrails. Benchmark the input filter against the deepset/prompt-injections set on Hugging Face — hundreds of labelled injection and benign prompts — and test redaction with format-valid but entirely fake identity-number strings you generate yourself, never real ones. Add output guardrails that block specific investment advice and system-prompt leakage, and a logged escalation path to a human whenever a guardrail trips. Red-team it with at least 10 adversarial prompts of your own and record what got through before your fix.
Hardened an LLM support assistant with layered guardrails — injection filtering benchmarked on a public injection dataset, PII redaction, output policy checks and a logged human-escalation path — documented in a before/after red-team report.